No, not that clown in the mirror. Well, sometimes.
Self-reflection in this case is your ability to evaluate your own performance of any skill, activity, knowledge, whatever. In this case, let's assume it has to do with riding motorcycles, and evaluating your own abilities, and based on that evaluation, make positive changes in the way you ride. Is this something you do? Is it something you think about?
Assuming you're not a riding god, and assuming you know that, and you're not a victim of the Dunning-Kruger Effect, most of us have some room for improvement in our riding. Barring having regular sessions with a riding coach who observes your riding and provides useful feedback, we're pretty much stuck with evaluating our own riding. We may read all the best books on becoming better riders. We may post questions on internet forums and eagerly sift through the answers. We may even ride with more accomplished buddies who demonstrate how they get up and down the local racer road. But even after we do all that, we still have to compare these ideals with an unvarnished look at the way we're riding now before we can hope to figure out the steps to take to improve. Yep, self-reflection.
Here's what got me thinking about this. A few weeks back I was with some motorcycle friends talking about (what else?) riding. One of these friends - who will remain nameless for now - knows more about what it takes to ride a motorcycle quickly and well than anyone else I have the pleasure to know. When the topic of conversation moved to embarrassing events, I related what happened when I crashed my motorcycle about a year ago.
Crashing my motorcycle is not something I like to do, and it had been 5 years since my prior crash, and 20 years back to the one before that. Last year's crash had been a bit of a mystery to me, and the only thing that seemed to explain it was too much throttle in a low traction situation, but the quickness and violence of the crash made that explanation a bit unsatisfying, and no one I'd talked to about it had any better of an explanation than that one.
When my friend heard how the crash happened, he said that he'd seen a lot of people crash by getting back on the throttle before they finished setting the lean angle for the turn, and in those cases these riders experienced losing the rear tire and low-siding even though their lean angle wasn't terribly steep and traction was not that bad. This seemed odd, and it stuck with me.
The next day a group of us were riding over the Sierra headed back to the Bay Area, and I began to reflect on what he'd said, asking myself, "Am I opening the throttle before I've finished setting the lean angle?" I didn't think about it every turn, but when I had time to think, I posed the question. Any time I felt like the rear tire had been squirming or skittering across the road, I posed the question. Here's what I found: yes, in some cases in some circumstances, I sometimes start opening the throttle before I finish setting the lean angle for the turn. Exciting! A new insight! Once home a brief exchange of messages confirming what had been suggested, and some helpful feedback, and more to work on.
The moral of the story is that it doesn't matter how much Code, Parks, Ienatsch, Hough or others you read, you've got to bring them with you when you ride. The only way to do that is save a little bit of bandwidth to observe and record your own riding, then - perhaps later - reflect on what you observed and how it compared to what you read. Is there a gap? Can you learn something from that gap? Can you bring that gap back to another reading of the book to see if you learn something else? I hope the answer is in all cases "yes"!
Self-reflection is a key skill to develop in becoming better at pretty much anything, including riding, just don't let staring in the mirror overwhelm everything else. We all know what happened to that Narcissus character.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Hawthorne!
Tomorrow begins the annual Bay Area Riders Forum (BARF) Rydther Rally bound for Hawthorne, NV. I think this is the 5th annual, or thereabouts. We travel to Hawthorne each year in memory of a deceased member whose motto was Ride There, wherever it might be. Going there by motorcycle is better than going just about any other way. We ride to Hawthorne every year to remind ourselves of the truth of his motto.
Why Hawthorne? Lots of reasons, but I'll start with four:
Once you're over the passes, the fun doesn't stop. You can have lunch at The Whoa Nellie Deli at The Mobil in Lee Vining to experience fine dining in a truly improbable setting. If that doesn't suit you, there's always Mountain View BBQ in Walker, CA, a worthy destination even if you chose to turn around and head back home.
While you're taking in the natural beauty, you'll pass right by the legendary Mono Lake, which is slowly returning to its earlier water levels.
As for Hawthorne itself? Well, Hawthorne is an old munitions town, with bunkers dotting the hillsides surrounding the town. It's a remote spot, a relatively quiet (unless they're disposing of old munitions) spot in the desert. It's inexpensive to stay there. It's inexpensive to eat there. The locals have always been happy to see us, and to share their hospitality over the course of a few days of days of riding and hanging out by the pool, and evenings of having fun over in Joe's bar. It's tough to beat.
See you when I get back.
Why Hawthorne? Lots of reasons, but I'll start with four:
- Tioga Pass
- Sonora Pass
- Ebbetts Pass
- Monitor Pass
Once you're over the passes, the fun doesn't stop. You can have lunch at The Whoa Nellie Deli at The Mobil in Lee Vining to experience fine dining in a truly improbable setting. If that doesn't suit you, there's always Mountain View BBQ in Walker, CA, a worthy destination even if you chose to turn around and head back home.
While you're taking in the natural beauty, you'll pass right by the legendary Mono Lake, which is slowly returning to its earlier water levels.
As for Hawthorne itself? Well, Hawthorne is an old munitions town, with bunkers dotting the hillsides surrounding the town. It's a remote spot, a relatively quiet (unless they're disposing of old munitions) spot in the desert. It's inexpensive to stay there. It's inexpensive to eat there. The locals have always been happy to see us, and to share their hospitality over the course of a few days of days of riding and hanging out by the pool, and evenings of having fun over in Joe's bar. It's tough to beat.
See you when I get back.
Hairpins (again!)
Two weeks ago I enjoyed a great goat trail ride! Some of my favorite Marin and Sonoma roads, little traffic, nice weather, and ripe blackberries by the roadside for a little al fresco feasting. Combine that with riding with good friends, and that's just about ideal. Throw in a new learning, and it gets even better.
I've posted before on the topic of hairpin turns on a couple of occasions because they cause problems for lots of riders. One of the varieties of hairpins that I've seen cause the most difficulty are downhill right-handers, and I devoted a post to that particular variety earlier this summer. Our ride two weeks ago demonstrated that uphill right-handers can be problematic too, and that's the topic of this post.
What do the two varieties have in common beyond the obvious fact of turning to the right? In the ones I've seen cause the most problems the other common feature is very short sight-lines - the rider can't see where the road goes beyond some obstruction (tree, hillside, wall, house) that is on the inside of the turn. The result of that short sight-line is one of the following, or some combination; the rider slows (not a bad idea), stiffens (not so good), stares at the ground in front of the front wheel that is visible, stares out the opposite side of the road which is also visible, forgets to shift down to a gear appropriate for the slower speed, etc. With the exception of the first one, not optimal responses. Let's examine them.
Slowing down is not a bad idea. The conventional wisdom is that you should travel at a rate at which it takes you four seconds to reach the edge of your line of sight so that you have adequate time to react to any obstruction of your path. It's pretty hard to argue against that even when your line of sight is so short that your speed drops to what feels like a crawl, however unless your path actually is obstructed, I can't remember seeing a hairpin so tight that you need to get your feet off the pegs. Keep your feet in the pegs, shift to a gear appropriate for your road speed, cover the clutch if necessary, and be very careful of using the front brake unless you actually have to stop. You're going uphill, so you should be able to control your speed by rolling off the throttle and/or using the rear brake.
Stiffening is pretty much always a bad idea, in hairpins or otherwise. It your elbows are stiff and/or you have a death grip on the bars, you're too stiff, and nothing good can come of that. This is the time when you need to be a little self-aware (difficult if you're frightened), and wiggle your fingers and waggle your elbows to loosen them up. Two of the most common causes are the following:
Looking at the ground. The old saying in motorcycling that shows up as more and more true the longer I ride is that you go where you look. Meaning in this case that if you look at the ground, that's where you're going. Looking at successive spots eight feet in front of you will mean that even at very low speeds the world will be a continual surprise, you'll be frightened, you'll stiffen as a result, and you make bad things more likely to happen. Get your eyes up.
Looking at the outside of the turn. Where you look is where you go, right? If you're looking at the opposite roadside, where do think you're likely to end up? Bingo! Across the road and in the ditch, unless you're really unlucky, in which case the local in the F350 heading to pick up the day's second sixpack may turn you into a hood ornament before you get there.
So, if it's okay to slow down, but it's bad to stiffen, or to look at the ground, or to look at the other side of the road, and your line of sight is blocked, where in the world are you supposed to look? I'm glad you asked. You want to keep your eyes probing the place where the road is about to appear. You're always pushing your eyes out in front so you can see the road surface at the earliest possible point of visibility. Your eyes won't be in just one place, you'll scan to the farthest point you can see, then let your eyes come back, then scan ahead, moving quickly to take it all in. Ideally, you should be scanning the roadside, the trees, the local geography to see what other cues about that emerging road you can pick up. I'll post something in the near future about reading the road, but for now keep looking ahead to where the road disappears (the vanishing point), keep on looking for the right-hand edge of the road, keep your eyes up, and your elbows and grip loose, and keep the bike on your side of the road. Enjoy!
I've posted before on the topic of hairpin turns on a couple of occasions because they cause problems for lots of riders. One of the varieties of hairpins that I've seen cause the most difficulty are downhill right-handers, and I devoted a post to that particular variety earlier this summer. Our ride two weeks ago demonstrated that uphill right-handers can be problematic too, and that's the topic of this post.
What do the two varieties have in common beyond the obvious fact of turning to the right? In the ones I've seen cause the most problems the other common feature is very short sight-lines - the rider can't see where the road goes beyond some obstruction (tree, hillside, wall, house) that is on the inside of the turn. The result of that short sight-line is one of the following, or some combination; the rider slows (not a bad idea), stiffens (not so good), stares at the ground in front of the front wheel that is visible, stares out the opposite side of the road which is also visible, forgets to shift down to a gear appropriate for the slower speed, etc. With the exception of the first one, not optimal responses. Let's examine them.
Slowing down is not a bad idea. The conventional wisdom is that you should travel at a rate at which it takes you four seconds to reach the edge of your line of sight so that you have adequate time to react to any obstruction of your path. It's pretty hard to argue against that even when your line of sight is so short that your speed drops to what feels like a crawl, however unless your path actually is obstructed, I can't remember seeing a hairpin so tight that you need to get your feet off the pegs. Keep your feet in the pegs, shift to a gear appropriate for your road speed, cover the clutch if necessary, and be very careful of using the front brake unless you actually have to stop. You're going uphill, so you should be able to control your speed by rolling off the throttle and/or using the rear brake.
Stiffening is pretty much always a bad idea, in hairpins or otherwise. It your elbows are stiff and/or you have a death grip on the bars, you're too stiff, and nothing good can come of that. This is the time when you need to be a little self-aware (difficult if you're frightened), and wiggle your fingers and waggle your elbows to loosen them up. Two of the most common causes are the following:
Looking at the ground. The old saying in motorcycling that shows up as more and more true the longer I ride is that you go where you look. Meaning in this case that if you look at the ground, that's where you're going. Looking at successive spots eight feet in front of you will mean that even at very low speeds the world will be a continual surprise, you'll be frightened, you'll stiffen as a result, and you make bad things more likely to happen. Get your eyes up.
Looking at the outside of the turn. Where you look is where you go, right? If you're looking at the opposite roadside, where do think you're likely to end up? Bingo! Across the road and in the ditch, unless you're really unlucky, in which case the local in the F350 heading to pick up the day's second sixpack may turn you into a hood ornament before you get there.
So, if it's okay to slow down, but it's bad to stiffen, or to look at the ground, or to look at the other side of the road, and your line of sight is blocked, where in the world are you supposed to look? I'm glad you asked. You want to keep your eyes probing the place where the road is about to appear. You're always pushing your eyes out in front so you can see the road surface at the earliest possible point of visibility. Your eyes won't be in just one place, you'll scan to the farthest point you can see, then let your eyes come back, then scan ahead, moving quickly to take it all in. Ideally, you should be scanning the roadside, the trees, the local geography to see what other cues about that emerging road you can pick up. I'll post something in the near future about reading the road, but for now keep looking ahead to where the road disappears (the vanishing point), keep on looking for the right-hand edge of the road, keep your eyes up, and your elbows and grip loose, and keep the bike on your side of the road. Enjoy!
Sunday, August 19, 2012
Why France (and Italy)?
In my last post I addressed the question that comes up about why it's so great to ride in the Alps. Next up is the follow up question, of all the alpine countries, why France? Good question. The Alps span France, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Germany, Slovenia, and you could even include Liechtenstein and Monaco in that list. You'd think that surely there must be great riding in those countries, and you'd be right.
After all, Austria is the country of The Sound of Music and its expansive alpine scenery. Austria is home to many roads - often toll roads - that seem to exist primarily for the pure joy of riding or driving them. The Grossglockner is a case in point. Austria is also home the greatest concentration of Biker Wilkommen signs I've ever seen. It seems the whole country is filled with restaurants and hotels competing for the business of vacationing motorcyclists.
Then there's Switzerland, the archetypal alpine country, all beautiful lakes, perfect houses with exquisite flower boxes, perfectly trimmed lawns, and roads without a speck of litter. Combine that with it being the home of some of the most legendary alpine roads (Furka, Bernina, etc.), and it would seem to be the one perfect place for an Alps motorcycling vacation.
Germany is a classic portal to the Alps. It's easy to get air connections from the US to Munich, visit the BMW factory, and take off into the Alps. The reality is that Germany is only a tiny portion of the Alps, and while there are nearby places to ride in Germany that are great such as the Black Forest, if you want to experience much of the Alps themselves, you won't be restricting yourself to Germany.
I can't really speak to Slovenia because I haven't ridden there yet, but what I know about it makes Slovenia very attractive, and I'm looking forward to trying it out. It looks wild and rugged and remote, and that's just what I most enjoy.
This brings us to France and Italy, and the things that are great about both of them. This may not win me any friends with the ministries of tourism for these two countries, but here goes. What I most love about France and Italy is that they are just a bit wilder, at bit less controlled, a bit more rugged,often a bit more remote, a bit more ragged than the other alpine nations. This is true in many ways, but seems particularly true around attitudes towards motorcycle traffic. It seems that both police and other road users in these countries understand that you're on a motorcycle and that you're going to be going quickly, and they make allowances for that. That hasn't been my experience in Austria, or particularly Switzerland - where it is joked that everything that is not obligitoire is most certainly interdit. France and Italy are just a little more like the wild west.
Where else can you come flying up behind a police car, have the officer look in the mirror, then wave you around? All this in a no passing zone! Where else do car drivers routinely move to their right a foot or so to enable you to easily overtake them on narrow mountain passes (truth be told, a lot of California drivers are pretty good about getting out of the way)? Where else is it acceptable to split between lanes of traffic moving opposite directions? Where else in the Alps can you find passes as wild, rugged, and simultaneously perfect and imperfect as the Col de la Cayolle or the Passo di Gavia?
An exaggerated analogy might be that France and Italy are to Switzerland as California is to Disney's California Adventure. One is the real thing; wild, imperfect, chaotic, and maybe a bit more dangerous. The other is refined, perfected, triple-distilled, constrained, controlled, and safer. Fair? No, not really, but fun.
For me, the greater wildness and tolerance of France and Italy make the experience of actually riding there ever so much more intense and enjoyable. As a rider it also requires me to be more on my game, more vigilant, more flexible, and more responsible for my own conduct because traffic enforcement isn't going to save me from myself.
France over Italy? Yes, by a slim margin. I somewhat prefer French food, but Matt prefers Italian. We both prefer French drivers, if only because they're slightly less aggressive than Italians. Both are a huge improvement over Americans. Oh, and I love the sound of the French language, whether I understand what I'm hearing or not, though Italian is quite nice too.
There you have it. Why I love riding some countries more than others. Some of the touring companies seem to concentrate on Austria and Switzerland. My suggestion is to try France. All those GS's with German plates seen each summer in the French passes may be on to something.
After all, Austria is the country of The Sound of Music and its expansive alpine scenery. Austria is home to many roads - often toll roads - that seem to exist primarily for the pure joy of riding or driving them. The Grossglockner is a case in point. Austria is also home the greatest concentration of Biker Wilkommen signs I've ever seen. It seems the whole country is filled with restaurants and hotels competing for the business of vacationing motorcyclists.
Then there's Switzerland, the archetypal alpine country, all beautiful lakes, perfect houses with exquisite flower boxes, perfectly trimmed lawns, and roads without a speck of litter. Combine that with it being the home of some of the most legendary alpine roads (Furka, Bernina, etc.), and it would seem to be the one perfect place for an Alps motorcycling vacation.
Germany is a classic portal to the Alps. It's easy to get air connections from the US to Munich, visit the BMW factory, and take off into the Alps. The reality is that Germany is only a tiny portion of the Alps, and while there are nearby places to ride in Germany that are great such as the Black Forest, if you want to experience much of the Alps themselves, you won't be restricting yourself to Germany.
I can't really speak to Slovenia because I haven't ridden there yet, but what I know about it makes Slovenia very attractive, and I'm looking forward to trying it out. It looks wild and rugged and remote, and that's just what I most enjoy.
This brings us to France and Italy, and the things that are great about both of them. This may not win me any friends with the ministries of tourism for these two countries, but here goes. What I most love about France and Italy is that they are just a bit wilder, at bit less controlled, a bit more rugged,often a bit more remote, a bit more ragged than the other alpine nations. This is true in many ways, but seems particularly true around attitudes towards motorcycle traffic. It seems that both police and other road users in these countries understand that you're on a motorcycle and that you're going to be going quickly, and they make allowances for that. That hasn't been my experience in Austria, or particularly Switzerland - where it is joked that everything that is not obligitoire is most certainly interdit. France and Italy are just a little more like the wild west.
Where else can you come flying up behind a police car, have the officer look in the mirror, then wave you around? All this in a no passing zone! Where else do car drivers routinely move to their right a foot or so to enable you to easily overtake them on narrow mountain passes (truth be told, a lot of California drivers are pretty good about getting out of the way)? Where else is it acceptable to split between lanes of traffic moving opposite directions? Where else in the Alps can you find passes as wild, rugged, and simultaneously perfect and imperfect as the Col de la Cayolle or the Passo di Gavia?
An exaggerated analogy might be that France and Italy are to Switzerland as California is to Disney's California Adventure. One is the real thing; wild, imperfect, chaotic, and maybe a bit more dangerous. The other is refined, perfected, triple-distilled, constrained, controlled, and safer. Fair? No, not really, but fun.
For me, the greater wildness and tolerance of France and Italy make the experience of actually riding there ever so much more intense and enjoyable. As a rider it also requires me to be more on my game, more vigilant, more flexible, and more responsible for my own conduct because traffic enforcement isn't going to save me from myself.
France over Italy? Yes, by a slim margin. I somewhat prefer French food, but Matt prefers Italian. We both prefer French drivers, if only because they're slightly less aggressive than Italians. Both are a huge improvement over Americans. Oh, and I love the sound of the French language, whether I understand what I'm hearing or not, though Italian is quite nice too.
There you have it. Why I love riding some countries more than others. Some of the touring companies seem to concentrate on Austria and Switzerland. My suggestion is to try France. All those GS's with German plates seen each summer in the French passes may be on to something.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Why the Alps?
From time to time folks will ask what the big deal is about riding in the Alps. After all, we've got some pretty great roads right here in California. We've got Yosemite and we've got Tioga Pass. We've got Big Sur and we've got the Sonoma coast. We've got Hwy 36 and we've got Hwy 25. We've got Mulholland and we've got teh (sic) 9. Hell, we can even lane split here in California, and if you get bored with that we can ride to Oregon, or Montana, or Alaska ferchissakes! So what the hell is the big deal?
Good question and good points! There is a wealth of great riding here in California, and even more in adjoining states. You could keep yourself busy riding new California roads every weekend for years. In fact, you should.
The great gift of riding in North America is space. Once you get out of the big cities, north or south, or across the valley, suddenly you have space. Even here in populous California you can easily find places that are empty. Riders coming here from Europe marvel at the distances you can travel in Nevada, or Utah, or Idaho where there is nothing for miles. It truly is a gift.
The Alps are different. The area has been densely populated for centuries, millennia really. And much of that time the tide of governments and cultures and armies have washed back and forth over them. It's the inverse of the space of the West. Not that it's what you'd call crowded, but it is developed. The benefit of this for motorcyclists is that all this development involved building roads, and those roads go nearly everywhere. Every river valley was a path for commerce. Every high cirque that didn't have a glacier became summer pasture. In between were countless farms and villages, and roads were needed to connect all of them. So today the place is positively cross-hatched with roads and trails, and many of those roads are paved. And most of those paved roads are positively brilliant on a motorcycle.
What it comes down to is sort of the inverse of space. It's road density. You can base around one town, and ride exciting, beautiful roads day after day, with very little repetition, and not much time spent on big busy roads or and big crowded cities. For example, one day in particular this year, Matt and I left the inn at Serre Chevalier, rode Izoard, Vars, Restefond, Bonette, Lombarde, Sampeyre, Agnel, and Izoard again in one day - and that's just the high passes! That does not include some of the really fun roads that connect them through the countryside. There is nowhere that I know of near where I live in California where you could ride so many amazing roads in just 400 kilometers (~240 miles).
There are other reasons to ride the Alps. The scenery is obviously spectacular. When little kids draw mountains, the mountains their crayons depict seem to be inspired by the Alps. The architecture is often nearly as breathtaking as the natural scenery. The food is great. And in my experience, the people are wonderful.
That said, for me there is at least one more reason to ride the Alps. If you're a baseball fan, and you love the game and all of its history and pageantry, if you love all the great games and players that have come before, you may feel the pull to make a pilgrimage to the sport's hallowed ground. Maybe for you it's Yankee Stadium, or Fenway, or Wrigley Field. A place where you can go to feel connected to all that has come before, and all that is yet to come. The Alps are like that for motorcyclists. I recall reading about alpine touring in Cycle World when I was a kid, seeing B&W photos of tourists on BMW R69's and Triumph T100's, gear lashed to the seat, layered up against the chill, with stunning mountainscapes in the background. I knew then at age twelve that this was where real riding happened. This was where a motorcyclist went for great riding and to meet great riders. This was hallowed ground.
Now after four trips I can say with all honesty that it has been everything I'd hoped it would be. That the roads, the scenery, the food, the people, the quality of the riders, and the quality of the riding I was inspired to do exceeded anything I could have reasonably expected, and often even exceeded what I'd unreasonable dreamed.
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Just Like Casey
One of the signature characteristics of roads in the Alps are the switchbacks. Lots and lots of switchbacks. On my first day there it seemed like I'd ridden more switchbacks in a day than in the prior year back home in California. In an earlier post I covered some ideas about riding downhill - particularly right-hand downhill - switchbacks. Today let's talk about uphill. As with downhill, right-handers are typically tighter, so keep that in mind.
By definition, it's tough to carry much corner speed in a switchback. Depending upon the radius of the turn, 15 or 20 mph can be a lot of corner speed. That means that often the throttle is completely closed on the way into the turn. On many modern fuel injected bikes, opening the throttle from fully closed can be a bit tricky when you're over on the side of the tire dealing with a tight line and with less than ideal surface conditions (i.e. gravel, diesel spills, sheep manure, etc.). That's because for many bikes the fuel injection acts a bit like a switch, either on or off, and when it comes on mid-turn it can do so with a bit of a lurch. How do you deal with that?
Both Matt and I were riding bikes that don't have quite perfect fueling - he on a BMW F800R and me on my 650 Versys. One night, comparing notes over dinner, we discovered that we were using the same technique to control the line, attitude and acceleration of our bikes as we executed uphill switchbacks - we were both dragging the rear brake as we rolled on the throttle.
How does this work? It's a bit of a subtle thing, but it makes a big difference. As one begins setting up for the turn by adjusting speed (usually meaning shifting down, closing the throttle, and applying both brakes) and swinging out to get the best entry line and speed for the turn, as one begins to turn in, the front brake is usually fully released - but not the rear brake. At this point the amount of pressure on the rear brake is very light, but still there. As the bike reaches maximum lean, and one's eyes are well through the turn, one begins to roll open the throttle. This can be the danger point. The bike is over on the side of the tires. The bike is not yet pointed at the exit. If the throttle comes on with a lurch or a bang, this can unsettle the bike and greatly undermine the confidence of the rider - not to mention make you ride like a n00b. This is where that subtle pressure on the rear brake is key. Keeping some pressure on the rear brake keeps the bike's suspension settled, and it buffers the impact of engine torque hitting the rear wheel. This results in increased rider confidence as the bike accelerates smoothly rather than abruptly, making it easier to apply the throttle earlier in the turn to bring the bike back upright as you get it pointed towards the exit of the turn.
How does one go about developing this technique? Probably the easiest way is riding around at low speed in parking lots making turns as tight as possible. The usual tools for managing the bike at low speeds are smooth throttle control, use of the clutch friction zone, and dragging the rear brake to stabilize the bike. Working on these tools while riding in tight circles in a parking lot will enable development of the feel and habit that will make the use of the rear brake on switchbacks feel more natural and comfortable.
If you'd like to get more instruction and coaching on low speed practice, there are a couple of resources I can recommend based on experience. If you are located near the SF Bay Area, the Alameda County Sheriff's Training Center puts on an excellent civilian motorcycle training class. This class will teach you a huge amount about low speed management of your motorcycle. There are other training classes of this sort around the country that teach you police motorcycle riding skills. Another class that will introduce you to these skills in a controlled environment with help and feedback is Lee Parks' Total Control clinics. Lee Parks' book can be a big help if you don't have access to one of his classes.
What does any of this have to do with Casey? When Matt and I were discussing this it reminded me of Matt Oxley's column in the August, 2012 issue of Bike magazine. Matt was describing all the reasons why we'll miss Casey Stoner when he retires from MotoGP, and he quotes Lucio Cecchinello, the owner of LCR, a Honda satellite racing team. Matt quotes Cecchinello describing Casey's first test on a 250 GP bike back in 2001, "He opened the throttle very, very, very early and he had this particular talent to use the rear brake when opening the throttle so the bike isn't so nervous."
See? Just like Casey. Whether you're riding tight switchbacks or MotoGP, you can use the rear brake to allow you to get on the throttle earlier without putting yourself on your head. You always wanted to say that you ride just like Casey, right?
Friday, July 27, 2012
Rain
Sorry that I've been quiet for so long. I've just returned from another pilgrimage to the Alps. The plan had been to blog throughout, but due to being busy riding, dining, chatting with friends, and planning the next day's ride, that didn't happen. The next several blog posts (at least) will be in reference to experiences and observations from that trip.
Those of us who call California home are so fortunate about rain. We don't see much of it in the summer, and if you we do, it's not very much or for very long. Not so northern Europe. It was sprinkling when I left the UK on the Channel Tunnel. It was sprinkling when I arrived in France, and before the day was through, it turned into a full on gully washer with limited visibility, water flooding road surfaces, etc. One of the lessons such downpours teach is what gear works in rain and what gear doesn't.
I'll start with a list of what gear worked in the rain because it's shorter:
- Ortlieb dry saddlebags. These are the only panniers I've ever had - hard or soft - that will keep their contents dry during an all day downpour.
- Daytona touring boots. I bought these last year at a Louis motorcycle store in Mannheim. The only way these get water inside them is if rain works its way through my pants, then drips down into the boots. These are wonderful and comfortable all day long.
- Aerostich Triple Digit rain covers. These pull on over your gloves to keep the rain off, and for the most part work pretty well, and much better than gloves alone.
- A fleece muffler that came as a giveaway with an issue of Fast Bikes, which I pull on over my head before donning my helmet. It keeps the rain off my neck, keeping me warmer and more comfortable. It's not waterproof, but it's bulky and absorbent, and water doesn't seem to reach my skin through it.
- The Kawasaki accessory top box stayed dry inside.
- Heated grips. Why don't ALL motorcycles have them? Seriously.
What didn't work? Pretty much everything else:
- Luggage that requires a rain cover. Rain covers are difficult to apply snugly while stopped along the highway in a downpour. Rain covers flap in the wind. The wind finds ways to lift covers and allow the migration of water past the cover and into the luggage beneath. My Marsee tankbag is well built, but in an all day downpour the contents will get damp.
- Motorcycle apparel that uses a waterproof liner as its method of keeping the rain out. In this case my Olympia mesh gear was less than ideal. I have loved Olympia gear for a long time, and have even manage to crash test it twice. It works great in many circumstances, but extended, driving rain storms is not one of those circumstances. First of all, you must remember to remove everything that you don't want getting wet from the pockets, and place it some other place that will stay dry, before the rain begins in earnest. Otherwise, your wallet, phone, passport, etc. will get soaked. Next, realize that this is because everything outside of the liner is expected to get wet. In an all day gully washer that means very wet. When it does, not only will the suit get sloshy, drippy and soggy - making you ever so welcome in that lovely roadside cafe in rural France - all that water up against the Goretex liner means that water will eventually migrate through to you on the inside. You will get wet inside. Tip: wear quick drying synthetic materials against your skin.
- When the above happens, and water gets to your skin, even the good stuff like the Daytona boots and Triple Digit rain covers will not keep those parts of your body dry because water will move along your skin past the sealing surfaces. Fingers and toes will be soaked too.
One other thing. I never thought I'd need a heated vest for a July ride in France so I didn't pack one. What I did pack was several Grabber adhesive body heat packs that I was able to open and stick to my t-shirt. These made it possible to continue when I was otherwise too cold and wet to safely carry on. They take up nearly no space in luggage, and last indefinitely as long as they are not exposed to oxygen. When the packaging is opened and they are exposed to oxygen the exothermic chemical reaction begins that generates heat for 6-8 hours. These will ALWAYS be in my tankbag, along with zipties, duct tape, and tools.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)